Author: Tomás Herrera

  • Why grocery prices stopped falling in June

    Why grocery prices stopped falling in June

    Grocery price disinflation over the past eighteen months looked broad. It was not. Roughly three quarters of it came from a single category — eggs, dairy and the protein complex downstream of feed costs — as the avian influenza outbreak resolved and grain prices normalised from their 2022 peak.

    That category has now returned to its pre-shock trend. There is no more room in it, which means the headline number from here reflects everything else, and everything else never disinflated much to begin with.

    Packaged goods are the clearest example. Manufacturer list prices in centre-store categories have risen at an annualised 3.1 per cent through the past four quarters, barely moving from the 3.4 per cent of the year before. The relief consumers noticed came almost entirely from promotional depth — retailers absorbing margin to hold traffic — and promotional depth is a lever with a floor.

    The June print showed that floor. Food-at-home came in flat month over month, which several commentators read as a pause. The internal composition suggests something less benign: continued decline in the protein complex offset by acceleration nearly everywhere else.

    For the Federal Reserve this is awkward rather than alarming. Grocery prices are not a policy target and do not enter the preferred inflation measure with much weight. For households they are the single most legible price signal in the economy, and legibility is what shapes expectations.

  • What the payrolls revision actually means

    What the payrolls revision actually means

    A benchmark revision is an accounting exercise, not a forecast. Once a year the Bureau of Labor Statistics reconciles its survey-based payroll estimate against unemployment insurance tax records, which cover nearly every employer and arrive with a long lag.

    This year the reconciliation removed 141,000 jobs from the spring. There are three defensible ways to read that.

    The first is that it is noise with a known cause. Benchmark revisions are systematically larger at turning points because the birth-death model that estimates job creation at new firms performs worst when firm formation is changing direction. On this reading the labour market is roughly what it appeared to be and the model will catch up.

    The second is that it confirms a slowdown already visible elsewhere. The household survey has run softer than the establishment survey for three months. Job openings have fallen. Quits are below pre-pandemic norms. The revision, on this reading, resolves a discrepancy in favour of the weaker series.

    The third is more specific and less comfortable: that the revision concentrates in leisure, hospitality and temporary help, and that those categories have historically turned first. Not a slowdown already underway, but the leading edge of one.

    The Fed will most likely take the second reading, because it requires the fewest new assumptions and because it is consistent with the direction officials have been signalling since spring. Whether that is right depends on data that does not exist yet.